Saturday, November 19, 2011

Romantic Comedies.....dissected!

One of my favorite genres of movies is the romantic comedy. I’m not talking about any specific movie here, just the genre. Romantic comedies rock the world; lets face it, everyone loves RomComs! Sure we know what’s going to happen, even before we see the movie and have seen only the first 5 seconds of the trailer, but something about those movies is just magical.
Now my question that I seek to answer through my (not so) scientific experiments is why people love romantic comedies.
There is a basic code for Romantic Comedies: Romance + Comedy = Rom Com. But what is romance and comedy? Let’s find out, shall we?
1)      Well, humans were meant to live in harmony together and be together, that’s why we had more then one generation, therefore, love is a natural instinct of humans. If romance was not real, I don’t think the human race would have lasted as long as it has. But there is more then just one level of romance. For instance:

a)      The super passionate romance: this is the kind of romance that a lot love stories try to illustrate. Basically super passionate romances are the kind when the two people love each other so much they would kill themselves if they cannot be with the other (Which is why Rom Coms rarely use this romance for their movies); but if you do this wrong it ends up coming off as stupid and winy. Because of this, only a handful of romantics pull off the whole super passionate bit well. For instance: 

·         Gone With the Wind: Scarlett and Rett are so perfect for each other that it seems like they would die without each other. Now we both know this isn’t true,  the famous ending of the story gives away the fact that they brake up in the end, but there is a faint hope that the two get back together again. If there wasn’t that hope, I doubt that Scarlett would have lived very much longer.  
·         Antony and Cleopatra: At the end of this story, Antony commits suicide after being told that his love, Cleopatra, has committed suicide. However, Cleopatra had not committed suicide, but soon after she found out that Antony was dead she did just that. But not only does she kill herself, she kills herself by snake, which is, of course, very painful. Need I say why this demonstrates passionate love?
·         Romeo and Juliet: We all know how this story ends. Juliet pretends to be dead, Romeo thinks she really is dead, he kills himself, Juliet  wakes up, she sees Romeo dead, and kills herself. By showing that they could not, or would not, live without each other, they show, in one way, the deepest type of passion romance.

b)      The perfect match romance: this is the type of romance that the man and the woman work extremely well together, and they love each other deeply, but still are in touch with their rational side, that is, they wouldn’t kill themselves if the other were to die, which is the only difference from the passionate romance. This type of romance has deep, profound themes and motifs, but it tends to be fun loving and a little quirky. This is the type of romance that the better romantic movies tend to be in. For example:
·         Pride and Prejudice: Now you know Elisabeth and Darcy are perfect for each other, I know Elisabeth and Darcy are perfect for each other, but do Elisabeth and Darcy know they are perfect for each other? Not until the end of the book. You have to see them grow into better people first. When they do grow into the perfect couple, they love each other very deeply, you can tell. However, there is a rational side to their love, and you get the feeling that they would kill each other if the other died. Of course, we can’t know for sure, considering Jane Austen didn’t write about the death of the beloved characters.
·          The Sound of Music: Maria falls in love with Georg when she was working as his governess. This movie is very sweet, but it is also very deep at some points. And making Georg a widower also makes the love a little more profound.
·         Breakfast at Tiffany’s: Holly Golightly is a sweet, naïve, eccentric girl who falls in love with Paul (or Fred, as Holly calls him), a writer who needs help getting on his feet. There are a lot of seriously immoral acts that happen throughout this classic movie, but the two are so sweet together that you almost don’t seem to notice. However, if one of them were to die, the other would not kill themselves, so this I defiantly not a passion romance, but a perfect match one.
·         Mostly Martha: This is a German film that has a very sweet story about Martha, a control-freak cook, who falls in love with Mario, a sweet easy going French guy. Their love is a very sweet sort of profound romance that will last the burden of time. No matter how much they love each other though, they would not commit suicide if the other were to die.

c)       The sweet romance: this is the one of the easiest types of relationships to show; it just takes a cute boy (it helps if he’s Irish) and a sweet girl to make this work. Movies tend to be able to pull this off much, much easier, (for example, Leap Year is about a Irish boy who falls in love with an American girl, there’s nothing really deep about the story, it’s just cute. P.S. I Love You has the same story, but it has much deeper themes and motifs. P.S I Love You would defiantly be a part of the perfect match romance, because it’s not just a sweet story, like Leap Year is, it’s a profound love and friendship piece) but there are those times when they mess sweet romances up, and when they mess it up, you know it’s bad (for example, 27 Dresses, this movie is not sweet, not cute, and most defiantly not deep in any way shape or form, I believe this the case because the main characters sleep with each other before they even get to know one another, making it unbelievable that they would ever actually fall in love. It sounds more like a one night stand to me, and not true love.) The boy needs to be sweet, and the girl needs to be likable, or at least they need to evolve into those types of people. They really don’t need a huge back story; they just need to work well together. For example:
·         Roman Holiday: Roman Holiday only takes place in a day’s time, so there is not a whole lot of back story, but it’s a sweet story.
·          When in Rome: this is just a standard romcom, but it is a good one nonetheless. This movie does lack the profound themes of the Perfect Match romance, and instead just has a sweet story.
·          The Holiday: this movie has two love stories in it, making it double fun! However, there is not much back story or philosophical motifs in it, just a charming, delightful story.
·          Sabrina: This is a Cinderella story starring Audrey Hepburn. It’s a sweet story, but it lacks the profound themes that the Perfect Match romance has to offer.

d)      The Teenage Romance: this is the lowest type of romance for a reason. It is one of the least believable romances, because so many of teenage romances don’t last.  There are exceptions, of course, just like there are exceptions in teenage movies. There are some teen movies that are great, and that have lasted the burden of time (anything by John Hughes, for example), and then there are the others…well, you know what I’m talking about. Teenage romance stories are rarely any good, and mostly they are for preteens anyway.  Lame. For example:
·         Prom: This is a deception of every proportion. For all you readers who think that high school is like this, well you wrong! Wrong, wrong, wrong! You have no brain cells! (Ok, you may have a few brain cells). But lets face it, high school is not like it is portrayed in this movie and it is not going to end happily for Nova and Jesse.
·         Twilight: Twilight is one of those books that I really dislike. I have nothing against vampires or werewolves; I just dislike this book/movie. Nothing feels real in this story, like it could actually happen. Because of this, it comes off as sorta stupid and winy. bleh.
·         High School Musical: Sometimes I wish that we had songs that would randomly burst out at my school, but then I remember I can’t sing, so that may be sorta a downer. this movie is also unbelievable, and will not withstand the burden of time, and will become dated (actually the first High school Musical is already dated).
·          Its Kind of a Funny Story: this is about a boy who is suicidal. This sorta has a darker plot lie then most teen movies, but it is a full true and true teen movie that will not last for to much longer in the world of entertainment, and will be considered dated before to long.
·         The Breakfast Club: At last, a good movie in the teen romance. The funny thing about this movie is, the romance is a little unbelievable, it probably won’t last more then three months and it still lasted the burden of time. I believe it is because John Hughes is just a good story teller and knows how to appeal to all ages.  


2)      One of those wise guys from a long time ago once said that when comedy is examined, it ceases to exist. This, unfortunately, is true. How often has it happened when you were younger a movie was funny or clever, and then became lame as you got older? That happened to me with Karate Kid and Tuck Everlasting. When I was younger I used to think that those movies were so cool. Then I got older, I started examining the humor and the style of those movies, and I realized that those really weren’t very funny, entertaining movies. They were, well, sorta lame.  But how can we really know what comedy is if we can’t get close enough to examine it? Well, obviously if there are different people who think different things are funny, but there are, like romance, levels of comedy.
a)      Sophisticated/ political Humor:   this type of comedy goes over the heads of almost everyone except for a select few. But lets face it, its not very funny.
b)      Raunchy/ crude Humor: this type of comedy is funniest for two groups, teenagers or people in their early 20s or any male over the age of 15. This type of comedy is, well, crude. A lot of people find this funny, and a lot of people find this repulsive. It’s just like any comedy, some like it, some do not. For example:
·         The Hangover: This movie has a lot of crude humor, and it has its consequences. I know a lot of people who can’t stand this movie because it is so crude and raunchy. I also know a lot of people who love this movie and think it’s one of the funniest movie ever.  
·         Knocked Up: This also is a very crude movie, with a lot of sex jokes and a lot of scenes that some would view as inappropriate. That’s just Seth Rogan for you though.
c)       Quick Witted Humor: so this type of comedy is, in my option, the funniest type. The people have to be fast and witty, or else this sorta falls flat. For the most part this tends to be the funniest. However, this type of humor is not really present in movies; it’s more in TV shows. TV shows only have a half hour or an hour to complete their story for that episode, so they need to talk fast and they need to get their jokes in fast. Movies, on the other hand, have two to three hours to complete a story, so they have a little more leeway on how fast they can deliver their jokes and their talking doesn’t have to be so fast. Because of that, all my examples for this section are TV shows instead of movies:
·         Psych: Psych is one of those outrages shows that references obscure 80s shows all the time. This show is extremely fast paste, quirky, and witty, and all around funny.  This is my favorite show.
·         Gilmore Girls: every one in Gilmore Girls talks extremely fast and quirky.
·         Community: Community has off the wall funny references and is a very quirky.

d)      Slapstick Humor: This humor is the lowest type of comedy because it’s, well, unsophisticated, and not at all witty. Most of these movies are forgotten within the first two years of being made. Now there are exceptions, just like there are exceptions for every type of humor; for instance, Charlie Chaplin is a great old time comedian and he used slapstick to get his laughs. However, I will say that only a very small percentage of slapstick comedians actually last the burden of time. In my option, there is really very little funny about this type of comedy, other then people tripping over a cake or spilling chili all over their face. There tends to be a big dog involved as well. Har de har har har. Typically, only children enjoy this type of comedy. For example:
·         Marmaduke: this is based off of the comic. It’s about a big dog. That’s about it.
·         The Duke: This is about a small dog. Who becomes a duke. I’m not kidding.
Now, rarely is a movie just one type of humor. For example, Saturday Night Live is political humor that is quick witted and, many times, crude. That’s why comedy is so hard to pin point, because there is more then just one type in even one movie.
3)      But the real question we’ve been wondering is how is a romantic comedy formed? What makes it work? Obviously you can’t have certain romances paired with certain comedies. For example, if you pair a passionate romance with slapstick comedy, then the passion seems petty and they don’t blend well. So, I’m going to show which comedies go with which romances.
a) The Passion Romances go with the Sophisticated/Political Humor: yes, the political humor works best with this type of romance, mostly because often this humor is serious, as is the passion Romance
b) The Perfect Match Romances go with the Quick Witted Humor: The perfect match romances need to be funny and slightly quirky, just the recipe for quick witted humor! These types of Romantic Comedies are my absolute favorite.
c) The Sweet Romance goes with the Quick Witted, and Raunchy/Crude humor: either the sweet romance is quick witted, or it’s crude, or both! For example, Bride Maids has quick witted humor and also some crude moments, it’s also very sweet.
d) The Teenage Romance goes with the Slapstick Humor: what do you know, the two lowest types of romantic comedies go with each other. I dislike these movies very, very much.

So why does everyone love romantic comedies so much? Well, no one can really know for sure why, but I can say this…people love stories that end happily. In the day to day life that is full of bitterness, hatred, and struggling just to get by, the way that you can forget about the strain of living is to simply watch a movie where there is no bad ending, there is no failure or sadness and everything works out in the end. The romantic comedy presents this happy ending, and it gives hope to the watchers. Whoa! I bet you weren’t expecting such a deep thought for such predictable movies were you?
So there you go, the different types of romantic comedies dissected. I must say this is definitely a good genre, though a little predictable. But when you are having fun watching a movie, then who cares if it’s predictable? Movies are for enjoyment, and I don’t know about you, but I very much enjoy watching those good old Romantic Comedies. 

Monday, October 17, 2011

just go with it

I had heard this movie was bad. I heard it was crude and sloppy and not at all funny. then I watched it, and I can safely say that that is false. Don't get me wrong, this isn't the best Adam Sandler movie ever, in fact it's probably not even in the top ten, but still, very enjoyable. you have got to love the funny Adam Sandler, the beautiful Jennifer Aniston, and the very lovable kids (I don't know their names). the plot of the movie is somewhat predictable, but aren't all Romantic Comedies? I thought this movie was extreamly enjoyable except for one part, or should I say one person.
I hated the cousin. he was annoying, obnoxious, crude, and not funny. that's how the writers were trying to portray him, I'm sure, but Sandler's character was supposed to be annoying, obnoxious, and crude, but you still liked him. he was interesting and funny. the cousin was not anything but stupid.
over all though, a good movie, not a great movie, but enjoyable. 
my grade: 80
 rated: PG-13 for some language and sexual jokes   

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Made of Honor (2007)

let me get something clear here. I love romantic comedies, and I love Patrick Dempsey. so Made of Honor was sort of a must see for me. the one thing I was thinking through out the entire movie was, “I love Patrick Dempsey!”…I was thinking that that is, until the end. we all know what’s going to happen Hannah (Michelle Monaghan) is going to end up with Tom (Patrick Dempsey). we all see it coming, so why WHY WHY would they have to have the “love enlighten” scene be at the wedding? Why? all that does is make Tom and Hannah look like the bad guys instead of the victims.
I may love Patrick Dempsey, but I don’t love him enough for him to act like a total jerk to a guy that’s going to make the biggest decision of his life and me just brush it off as a romantic comedy action! Come on!
I would have enjoyed this movie much, much more if they would have had the profession of love before the wedding, its that simple. Even the night before the wedding would have been better. if you were to switch the roles around so that Patrick Dempsey was the one getting dumped at the wedding, no way would that be considered a nice girl. Nope. nope. nope.
what would have also made the movie better is if the Scottish guy that Hannah was going to marry had some fault to him. maybe he could have been a control freak, or had an anger problem, or was a compulsive liar, or anything. But instead Hannah leaves the nice boy to go to the bad boy, I haven’t heard that before. But over all, pretty basic rom com. nothing too special, but it did have Patrick Dempsey in it.
My rating: 79 because Patrick Dempsey could have done better at the profession of love
The rating: PG-13 for some language and a little of sexual content (Actually it wasn’t that bad, in comparison to something like Crazy Stupid Love, this movie should be like PG, not PG-13)
Not a must see.

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Thor review

Thor is one of those superheroes that I did not know existed until the movie came out. Then when the movie did come out I never saw it in theaters (I’m not sure why, my dad said that Thor is one of his favorite superheroes, it’s sorta weird that we saw Captain America but not Thor, but whatever). Anyway, I’m watching Thor and only one thought is going through my mind:
I liked Captain America better.
I couldn’t help it, I really couldn’t. I really, really, REALLY wished that I had seen Thor first then I could be all like “WOW I love this movie!” then once I saw Captain America I could be like “OMG I LOVE THIS MOVIE SO MUCH! I LOVE CHRIS EVENS! I LOVE CAPTAIN AMERICA  <3 <3 <3” (I’m not sure how I would say the “<3” but I’m sure I would have found a way.)
And you may be wondering WHY I liked Captain America better. It’s really not a simple answer, but I’ll try my best to show my mind to all of you.
1: the girl, Jane (Natalie Portman) kinda bugged me. Don’t get me wrong, I like Natalie Portman in almost everything she has been in (Except the Star Wars films, I hate the prequels of Star Wars and I always will, but that is a completely different review all together) but she bugged me nonetheless. For example, (Spoiler!) at the end when Thor finally gets his power back and he’s all dressed up in his getup Jane says, “is this how you always look?” Thor responds, “More or less,” and Jane is all like, “It’s a good look” while shaking her head and checking him out.  All this tells me is that Jane only likes Thor for his body and not for his attitude or for his mind or his actions or anything other then his body. Nice. Really smooth. Now if you compare Jane to Peggy Carter from Captain America then you will see the exact opposite. Peggy Carter liked Steve Rogers even before he became Captain America. When he was tiny and small and very unattractive. Then he became supermegaawesomehot Captain America and Peggy obviously didn’t complain, but she liked him the exact same. Some how this sort of love seems a lot more sincere, I can’t imagine why.
2: the animation was not good at all. In fact, it is what you would call horrible. Captain America’s animation was not very good as well, but the movie was not so dependent on the animation that it was super noticeable. But Thor was the exact opposite, the story required so much animation, and since it wasn’t that good the poor quality of the animation was much more noticeable. At some points I felt like I was in a video game. I feel like they could have tried a bit harder in that regard, but I guess no one asked Molly before making this movie.
3: Thor goes from being a total jerk to being an awesome guy that makes you eggs in the morning in like 5 minutes. What the heck happened? Not a lot of actual changing time takes place in between jerk Thor and nice Thor.  Although I did say that I did not like the fact that Captain America did not have a lot of character development, I do think that it sorta works better in a movie that is only 1 ½ hours to 2 hours long not to have major character change.
So those are the 3 major reasons why I did not like Thor. But despite these things I have said, I did enjoy the movie. And that’s what you’re supposed to do! You are supposed to go to the movies to enjoy whatever movie you see, and this movie is one of those movies that you will laugh at, that you will appreciate, that you will enjoy! I recommend this to anyone who likes Marvel movies.
My rating: 79
rating: PG-13 for some slight language.

Friday, September 16, 2011

the planet of the apes (Origanal)

So I watched the Planet of the Apes for the first time in 11 years. when I was 5 the story was a bit more compelling, I’m not even going to lie. like when you first see the statue of liberty and you are like, “Whaaaaaaaaaaaattttttt??? they are on EARTH??? WOW!” or at lest that’s the way I was.
then I saw it again as a 16 year old….
Its not a bad movie. its not a great movie either, but there is a reason that it is one of the most remembered movies of all movie history, and that reason is that it makes you think on a deeper level about what it means to be human. For instance, if a ape walks like a human, talks like a human, thinks like a human, and acts like a human does that make him an equal to humans? or is there some other trait that separates us from the beasts? all that is really interesting factors of The Planet of the Apes, but then you start to get into the more nitty gritty parts of the Planet of the Apes and you realize that there are some major holes in their logic. Like if Tyler is supposedly super smart guy then how come he doesn’t realize that the planet he’s on is earth? let me count the ways that the movie gives away that its earth they are on:
1: they were supposed to land on earth
2: they could breathe the air
3: there are humans
4: there is plant life
5: there are apes
6: all the apes speak English
7: at the end when they are proving that humans ruled the earth before apes, Tyler knew that the proof was a hearing aid, a piece holder, and a glasses
8: there was a doll that said “maaaaaaamaaaaaa” in a creepy way that it did
isn’t that enough evidence you need to infer that you are on earth? if it were me, I would think it was earth just on the fact that they were supposed to land on earth. so why doesn’t Tyler think that? why does he think they are on a completely other planet? what evidence does he have? I’ll tell you what evidence he has… NONE! ZIP! NADA!
So why does he insist that it is not earth until the very end when the statue of liberty is buried in the sand? why? WHY? DARN YOU ALL! DARN YOU ALL TO HECK!
other then that…good movie, very much worth seeing if you haven’t, in which case you shouldn’t have read my review because it is literally all spoilers, but come on this is over a almost 40 year old movie, deal with it, if you already didn’t know the things I said then you should be banned from society. Goodbye!
haha just kidding (or am I?)
my grade: 90% on account of being awesome and old.
Rating: PG (I think?) I would say it is actually PG-13 now a days though because there is cussing in it, nothing bad, just a lot of little swear words.
My ending thoughts: see it.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

The Social Network

The Social Network, a movie about how facebook is bad for you and how Mark Zuckerberg is a jerk. Especially to his friend, Spiderman. it is also about irony, because Mark made this social network only to have no friends. Weird, huh?
So when the movie first starts out, you see Mark with his girlfriend, soon to be ex girlfriend. he is talking about how he is smarter then her and how the only reason why they got into the bar that they were in was because she slept with the gourd outside. Already you dislike him, and it hasn’t even been 3 seconds yet. Perhaps this scene was a little over done, mostly because you never got a chance to like Mark, and the question you ask yourself is, why on earth did this nice, sweet, woman EVER date this guy????
No one knows. But they don’t remain dating for long.
But anyway, then Mark shows his EVEN jerkier side by blogging about his ex girlfriend’s bra size. Now if there are any guys out there, the one why to make you look like a total @$$hole his to say something about a woman’s breast, weather it be her bra size or whatever. Take it from me, please, never, NEVER ever EVER say stuff like that EVER EVER EVER, because you will be hated by everyone (I actually think there is one, just one, exception to this rule, think Pam and Jim from the Office when Jan came in with her new boob job in season 3 or 4, back when the Office was cool, that's maybe okay. maybe.). So I cannot stand this guy now, because he broke the number 1 rule of me liking a person. But enough about breasts, on to the whole point of the movie.
Then you introduce the guys who are the hot rowers who also like computers. They go to Mark to get him to sign on to there Pre-facebook facebook idea thing. Mark says yes, and then starts working on his own thing, The Facebook.
The movie is constantly switching back and forth from the law suit to the time that it actually happened, and I got to admit, I liked that aspect of it.
So the two brothers get mad, and they sue him.
And then Mark starts acting like a total jerk to Spiderman, and I’m like, dude, back off. Then Spiderman sues him, and so you are seeing two lawsuits at once happening. Pretty exciting!
I liked the movie, although it wasn’t quite what I was expecting. It was a bit more dramatized and artistic then I was thinking, but I was still was a good movie. I know why it was nominated for best picture, but who could beat the Kings Speech? And Colin Firth? Who can beat him? I’ll answer that for you, no one. No one at all. Oh! I think I know who I’ll write about next!
My grade: 91
Rating: PG-13, but they do drop the f bomb, twice, but one time you can’t hear that well. There is also some pot smoking and sex, but you don’t see anything.