Monday, June 25, 2012

Brave

The first time I had heard about Brave was directly after Toy Story 3 came out. Disney-Pixar announced the upcoming movies, all of which happened to be sequels to previous Disney-Pixar movies (Ex: Cars 2 and Monsters University, sequel to Monsters Inc.). The one movie that stood out was this movie about a Scottish princess who longed to be an archer instead of getting married, arranged by her parents. The moment I heard of the plot the thought that came into my head was “I can’t wait until summer 2012”
First off, let me say, Brave is a very, very good movie. However, the one thing that I didn’t like about the movie was the whole, well, vibe seemed slightly off. Not in a bad way, mind you, but in a different way. Most Disney-Pixar movies have a certain feeling about them, whether it be humorous feelings (such as Monster Inc. or The Incredibles)  or more of sentimental feelings (such as Up, or Toy Story 3). But Brave didn’t really have very strong of either of these points. I’m not saying the jokes weren’t funny, or the storyline wasn’t touching. It just wasn’t quite the same as previous Disney-Pixar movies.  Another thing about Brave that wasn’t necessarily a bad thing as much as of a different approach was all the butt humor. There seemed to be a lot more actual butts shown in this movie then in previous Disney-Pixar movies, which one can argue whether or not that is appropriate for children. Then again, parents will take there kids to practically anything (I know of a woman who brought her little 8 year old kid to the Hunger Games. Then she got mad that it was too violent. Sadly, I’m not kidding.), so a few butts isn’t the worst thing you could show your kid. Other then little things such as that, the movie was extremely well done. The visuals were spectacular and the fact that it was set in Scotland made it different and refreshing. This is a wonderful movie; I would recommend it to everyone who enjoys Disney-Pixar movies, or to anyone who likes a nice family movie.
My Rating: 87
Rated: PG for slight violence and some crud humor
Over all comments: Well worth seeing. When I went to the movie I went with a group, and everyone was saying how much they liked the movie, so you know it has to be a good movie when more the one person likes it, right? :P But seriously, it is a wonderful movie.

Monday, May 21, 2012

Avengers

So it has taken me a while to get this review out, even though I saw the Avengers opening weekend. I cannot believe how long I waited for the Avengers to finely come! And what do you know, it completely lived up to the hype. I was very impressed of how awesome the movie was. There were only a few things I didn't like, and they were pretty minor. I didn't like how Thor was. He was way, way, way, WAY too boring. He didn't grow as a character at all. Take a look at Captain America. He was thrown out of his generation and into a age where technology is everywhere. Chris Evans did a stupendous job as a '40's army boy brought to life. Whenever good old Steve Rogers would use words like "Ma'am" my heart would skip a beat. Why can't guys be more like that, hum? Captain America had a depth that he didn't have in his first movie.  On the other hand Thor didn't evolve at all. He just stood around, getting mad at people and scowling. I believe that Thor could be a great character, but he just didn't meet the mark. But perhaps Thor will shine in his up coming movie coming to a theater near you in 2014, along with a Captain America movie coming shortly after that.
Iron Man was amazing. I couldn't get over how good Robert Downy Jr. acted as Iron Man. I believe that this was Downy's best acting as Iron Man ever. I cannot wait for his new movie coming out next summer.
The Hulk was awesome! I was disappointed in the two Hulk movies, because, well, they were pretty lame. By far this was the best movie Hulk was involved in. I was very impressed by Hulk's performance.
Over all, this movie was very, very good. I believe that this was one of the best super hero movies of all time and should be seen by all. If you have not seen it, make sure you stay after the credits.
My Rating: 94 very high rating for a super hero movie, good job Marvel :)
 Rated: PG-13 for all the awesome action
Over all comments: Great movie and everyone should see it. Also if you want to see a funny spoof on some of these superhero movies look up "How it should have ended" on youtube. Very funny :)

Friday, March 23, 2012

The Hunger Games....at last!

Last night I went to the very much expected Hunger Games movie. How long have I waited for this? It seems like forEVER, and I have to say that I was pleased with the outcome of the movie. There were a few things that I really didn't like as much as I was hoping I would, but over all the movie was superb. For those of you who don't know the story, though I highly doubt that there are very many of you considering the propaganda surrounding this movie, The Hunger Games takes place in a post apocalyptic world were 2 children, or "tributes", from each of the 12 districts are required to fight to the death annually in a punishment known as "The Hunger Games". A long time ago, there was a rebellion, and the "capitol", the ruling city over the 12 districts, took over and made the hunger games as a punishment for the uprising.  Tributes are forced to choose between killing or being killed, which raises many ethical questions. Katniss Everdeen, the story's heroin, is from district 12, a poor and dyeing place where people die from starvation on a regular basis. Gale, Katniss' best friend (and maybe more then friends?) is a young handsome man who tries to brake free from the capital in any way he can. Peeta, the other tribute from district 12, is a young man who has been in love with unsuspecting Katniss ever since he can remember. If you want to know who Katniss chooses, you should read the books and find out. The book is such an awesome story that everyone knew that the movie would have to do a pretty good job to please the fans. I am pleased to say they did. Although about 97% of the movie was totally awesome, there was the other 3% that was slightly off. An example of this is the scene where the tributes are being paraded through the streets and Katniss and Peeta are "on fire" was very...lame. The fire looked completely fake, and it was supposed to be Cinna, district's 12's stylist, that had the two tributes hold hands, not Peeta. And also the scene in the cave when they are at the hunger games was not as heartfelt as it was in the book (although I blame that one on book to movie translation error and it couldn't be helped). Over all I was pleased with the movie. Now its time to go and see it again! And may the odds be ever in you favor!
Rating: PG-13 for violence. Seriously, don't take your 8 year old brother too see this, people kill each other in this movie like no one's business.
My rating: I have two ratings here, one for if I had not read the book, and one because I have read that book. If I had not read the book I would have given this movie a 96. Because I have read the book I give it a 94, because I feel like certain scenes where not as strong as they were in the book.
Over all comment: This is an awesome movie and I highly recommend it to everyone    

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Batman...with no Robin. Thank goodness!

So, as most of you probably know, there is a new Batman movie coming out. The Rise of the Dark Knight, or something like that. Anyway, I figured it was best for me to get in the pop cultured groove and go ahead and see Batman Begins. For all those people who have not seen it, I recommend it, however, I did not think it was the best superhero movie. The story plot wasn't bad, in fact I sorta liked it. BUT it was very confusing in the beginning. Like this Que-Gon man is all ninja, then he turns out to be bad, and then there's a fire, and I'm left in the dark thinking....What? who was the guy with the mask? was that Bruce? or was that the other ninja? Anyway, it made me confused. But once the story started moving along it started to get better. The only 3 problems with the movie that I saw was 1) Bruce had no character besides Batman. he was just some rich guy who bought everything. It got sorta unbelievable at some points. Reason number 2) One of the main themes of this movie was everyone must face their fears, but when they took the fear stuff, everyone's fears looked the same. Some glowing red eyes with some dark stuff flying around. Don't get me wrong, that's scary and all, but I would have liked to see some verity in the fears. And reason # 3) This is the biggest problem I had with the movie, I couldn't tell who was who when there was fight scenes. I eventually just stopped watching, it was too much to take in at a time. Oh, and also, the raspy voice got a little corny. But at lest you couldn't tell it was Bruce, unlike some of the earlier Batman movies (which were l-a-m-e LAME). So Batman wasn't a bad movie, it just Batman isn't my favorite hero (I didn't say "super hero" you'll notice, because, as you know, Batman does not have any super powers, he's just a rich guy. He's not even super smart and rich, like Tony Stark, AKA Iron Man. He's just has money, that's it). Spider-man is my favorite hero. Peter Parker is believable (other then, you know, the whole spider thing), and he is interesting. Bruce, not so much. But who knows? I have been told the Dark Knight is a better movie, maybe we'll see Bruce's real colors in the squeal...

Rated: PG-13, because of action, nothing gory or nasty, just some good, old fashion smack down.
My Rating: 83
Over all comments: I'm glad it didn't have Robin in it. Everything cool about Batman is taken away with the addition of Robin. My Mom once said "Robin shouldn't be in the comic book universe. Not only is he not a super hero, he's not even rich. He's just friends with a rich guy" I have to agree with her.

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Sherlock Holmes: A game of Shadows

        The best movie theater in my area is a theater called Malco. Malco is nice because it has stadium seating. You maybe are wondering what this has to do with Sherlock Holmes. Well, the first time I saw Sherlock Holmes 2 I didn't get to sit in the stadium seating, but instead in the area in the front. I could literally only see one part of the screen at a time. On top of that the particular showing that my family and I were going to had the close captioning, so instead of watching the movie I was reading the scrip. Add that to the fact that Sherlock Holmes has a very confusing, fast paced story line then you’re in trouble. So I decided to go and see it again, and let me tell you, the second time was infinitely better (Besides the slightly annoying people behind me). We got to sit farther away in the stadium seating, and we didn't have subtitles this time. Plus the second time around the story is very much less confusing. Sherlock Holmes is one of the year’s best movies, with lots of action that rivals the first one. I did enjoy this Sherlock better then the first, although they are about the same. There are a lot of great camera works (running through the woods for one), great actors (Judd Law and Robert Downy Jr. have done it again as the quirky duo they so beautifully created in the first Sherlock movie), and very deep moments in this movie (when their on the train for one, and when Sherlock does a very surprising act at the end of the movie for another). In an interview with Robert Downy Jr., he said that a lot of sequels will not do as well as the first because of the high expectations, and that the best thing that you can do is keep your head low and hope for the best. Let me tell you, this movie rivals the first. I would recommend this movie to anyone who has a love of good action movies and who can keep up with the fast pace of the movie. In fact this movie is so good that you will have to see it twice, especially if you had an experience like mine :) 

My Rating: 95
Rated: PG-13 for lots of action and some drug references   

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Happy New Year!

Can you believe it? A whole new year is here! 2012, who would have thunk, right? now I don't know what you all's resolutions are for the new year, but I believe that everyone should try to think a bit more intellectually. You can do that by reading more books and by watching movies that challenge you thinking.On top of that, there are movies that are referenced in a lot of movies and TV shows, and if have not seen any of these movies, you have no idea on what's going on. So here is a list of 30 movies you should watch at lest one time in your lifetime.
1) Chinatown
2) Gone With The Wind
3) Fiddler On The Roof
4) Breakfast At Tiffany's
5) A New Hope
6) The Empire Strikes Back
7) Return of the Jedi
8) The Breakfast Club
9) Pretty In Pink
10) The Fellowship of the Ring
11) The Two Towers
12) The Return of the King
13) 16 Candles
14) It's a Wonderful Life
15) It Happened One Night
16) The Matrix
17) The Castle
18) Planet of the Apes
19) Secondhand Lions
20) The King's Speech
21) True Grit (either the new or the old) 
22) The Man Who Knew too Little
23)The Blue Brothers
24) Dirty Harry
25) Grand Torino
26) Pirates of the Caribbean
27) The Wedding Singer
28) Shrek
29)The Wizard of Oz
30) Napoleon Dynamite
Now most of these movies you have probably seen, or at lest heard of. These are all great movies that I think that everyone should seen these movies at lest once in their lifetime. Until next time, I hope that everyone has a safe and good holiday, and that everyone has a Happy New year with lots of blessings to come this next year.  Cheers! 

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Romantic Comedies.....dissected!

One of my favorite genres of movies is the romantic comedy. I’m not talking about any specific movie here, just the genre. Romantic comedies rock the world; lets face it, everyone loves RomComs! Sure we know what’s going to happen, even before we see the movie and have seen only the first 5 seconds of the trailer, but something about those movies is just magical.
Now my question that I seek to answer through my (not so) scientific experiments is why people love romantic comedies.
There is a basic code for Romantic Comedies: Romance + Comedy = Rom Com. But what is romance and comedy? Let’s find out, shall we?
1)      Well, humans were meant to live in harmony together and be together, that’s why we had more then one generation, therefore, love is a natural instinct of humans. If romance was not real, I don’t think the human race would have lasted as long as it has. But there is more then just one level of romance. For instance:

a)      The super passionate romance: this is the kind of romance that a lot love stories try to illustrate. Basically super passionate romances are the kind when the two people love each other so much they would kill themselves if they cannot be with the other (Which is why Rom Coms rarely use this romance for their movies); but if you do this wrong it ends up coming off as stupid and winy. Because of this, only a handful of romantics pull off the whole super passionate bit well. For instance: 

·         Gone With the Wind: Scarlett and Rett are so perfect for each other that it seems like they would die without each other. Now we both know this isn’t true,  the famous ending of the story gives away the fact that they brake up in the end, but there is a faint hope that the two get back together again. If there wasn’t that hope, I doubt that Scarlett would have lived very much longer.  
·         Antony and Cleopatra: At the end of this story, Antony commits suicide after being told that his love, Cleopatra, has committed suicide. However, Cleopatra had not committed suicide, but soon after she found out that Antony was dead she did just that. But not only does she kill herself, she kills herself by snake, which is, of course, very painful. Need I say why this demonstrates passionate love?
·         Romeo and Juliet: We all know how this story ends. Juliet pretends to be dead, Romeo thinks she really is dead, he kills himself, Juliet  wakes up, she sees Romeo dead, and kills herself. By showing that they could not, or would not, live without each other, they show, in one way, the deepest type of passion romance.

b)      The perfect match romance: this is the type of romance that the man and the woman work extremely well together, and they love each other deeply, but still are in touch with their rational side, that is, they wouldn’t kill themselves if the other were to die, which is the only difference from the passionate romance. This type of romance has deep, profound themes and motifs, but it tends to be fun loving and a little quirky. This is the type of romance that the better romantic movies tend to be in. For example:
·         Pride and Prejudice: Now you know Elisabeth and Darcy are perfect for each other, I know Elisabeth and Darcy are perfect for each other, but do Elisabeth and Darcy know they are perfect for each other? Not until the end of the book. You have to see them grow into better people first. When they do grow into the perfect couple, they love each other very deeply, you can tell. However, there is a rational side to their love, and you get the feeling that they would kill each other if the other died. Of course, we can’t know for sure, considering Jane Austen didn’t write about the death of the beloved characters.
·          The Sound of Music: Maria falls in love with Georg when she was working as his governess. This movie is very sweet, but it is also very deep at some points. And making Georg a widower also makes the love a little more profound.
·         Breakfast at Tiffany’s: Holly Golightly is a sweet, naïve, eccentric girl who falls in love with Paul (or Fred, as Holly calls him), a writer who needs help getting on his feet. There are a lot of seriously immoral acts that happen throughout this classic movie, but the two are so sweet together that you almost don’t seem to notice. However, if one of them were to die, the other would not kill themselves, so this I defiantly not a passion romance, but a perfect match one.
·         Mostly Martha: This is a German film that has a very sweet story about Martha, a control-freak cook, who falls in love with Mario, a sweet easy going French guy. Their love is a very sweet sort of profound romance that will last the burden of time. No matter how much they love each other though, they would not commit suicide if the other were to die.

c)       The sweet romance: this is the one of the easiest types of relationships to show; it just takes a cute boy (it helps if he’s Irish) and a sweet girl to make this work. Movies tend to be able to pull this off much, much easier, (for example, Leap Year is about a Irish boy who falls in love with an American girl, there’s nothing really deep about the story, it’s just cute. P.S. I Love You has the same story, but it has much deeper themes and motifs. P.S I Love You would defiantly be a part of the perfect match romance, because it’s not just a sweet story, like Leap Year is, it’s a profound love and friendship piece) but there are those times when they mess sweet romances up, and when they mess it up, you know it’s bad (for example, 27 Dresses, this movie is not sweet, not cute, and most defiantly not deep in any way shape or form, I believe this the case because the main characters sleep with each other before they even get to know one another, making it unbelievable that they would ever actually fall in love. It sounds more like a one night stand to me, and not true love.) The boy needs to be sweet, and the girl needs to be likable, or at least they need to evolve into those types of people. They really don’t need a huge back story; they just need to work well together. For example:
·         Roman Holiday: Roman Holiday only takes place in a day’s time, so there is not a whole lot of back story, but it’s a sweet story.
·          When in Rome: this is just a standard romcom, but it is a good one nonetheless. This movie does lack the profound themes of the Perfect Match romance, and instead just has a sweet story.
·          The Holiday: this movie has two love stories in it, making it double fun! However, there is not much back story or philosophical motifs in it, just a charming, delightful story.
·          Sabrina: This is a Cinderella story starring Audrey Hepburn. It’s a sweet story, but it lacks the profound themes that the Perfect Match romance has to offer.

d)      The Teenage Romance: this is the lowest type of romance for a reason. It is one of the least believable romances, because so many of teenage romances don’t last.  There are exceptions, of course, just like there are exceptions in teenage movies. There are some teen movies that are great, and that have lasted the burden of time (anything by John Hughes, for example), and then there are the others…well, you know what I’m talking about. Teenage romance stories are rarely any good, and mostly they are for preteens anyway.  Lame. For example:
·         Prom: This is a deception of every proportion. For all you readers who think that high school is like this, well you wrong! Wrong, wrong, wrong! You have no brain cells! (Ok, you may have a few brain cells). But lets face it, high school is not like it is portrayed in this movie and it is not going to end happily for Nova and Jesse.
·         Twilight: Twilight is one of those books that I really dislike. I have nothing against vampires or werewolves; I just dislike this book/movie. Nothing feels real in this story, like it could actually happen. Because of this, it comes off as sorta stupid and winy. bleh.
·         High School Musical: Sometimes I wish that we had songs that would randomly burst out at my school, but then I remember I can’t sing, so that may be sorta a downer. this movie is also unbelievable, and will not withstand the burden of time, and will become dated (actually the first High school Musical is already dated).
·          Its Kind of a Funny Story: this is about a boy who is suicidal. This sorta has a darker plot lie then most teen movies, but it is a full true and true teen movie that will not last for to much longer in the world of entertainment, and will be considered dated before to long.
·         The Breakfast Club: At last, a good movie in the teen romance. The funny thing about this movie is, the romance is a little unbelievable, it probably won’t last more then three months and it still lasted the burden of time. I believe it is because John Hughes is just a good story teller and knows how to appeal to all ages.  


2)      One of those wise guys from a long time ago once said that when comedy is examined, it ceases to exist. This, unfortunately, is true. How often has it happened when you were younger a movie was funny or clever, and then became lame as you got older? That happened to me with Karate Kid and Tuck Everlasting. When I was younger I used to think that those movies were so cool. Then I got older, I started examining the humor and the style of those movies, and I realized that those really weren’t very funny, entertaining movies. They were, well, sorta lame.  But how can we really know what comedy is if we can’t get close enough to examine it? Well, obviously if there are different people who think different things are funny, but there are, like romance, levels of comedy.
a)      Sophisticated/ political Humor:   this type of comedy goes over the heads of almost everyone except for a select few. But lets face it, its not very funny.
b)      Raunchy/ crude Humor: this type of comedy is funniest for two groups, teenagers or people in their early 20s or any male over the age of 15. This type of comedy is, well, crude. A lot of people find this funny, and a lot of people find this repulsive. It’s just like any comedy, some like it, some do not. For example:
·         The Hangover: This movie has a lot of crude humor, and it has its consequences. I know a lot of people who can’t stand this movie because it is so crude and raunchy. I also know a lot of people who love this movie and think it’s one of the funniest movie ever.  
·         Knocked Up: This also is a very crude movie, with a lot of sex jokes and a lot of scenes that some would view as inappropriate. That’s just Seth Rogan for you though.
c)       Quick Witted Humor: so this type of comedy is, in my option, the funniest type. The people have to be fast and witty, or else this sorta falls flat. For the most part this tends to be the funniest. However, this type of humor is not really present in movies; it’s more in TV shows. TV shows only have a half hour or an hour to complete their story for that episode, so they need to talk fast and they need to get their jokes in fast. Movies, on the other hand, have two to three hours to complete a story, so they have a little more leeway on how fast they can deliver their jokes and their talking doesn’t have to be so fast. Because of that, all my examples for this section are TV shows instead of movies:
·         Psych: Psych is one of those outrages shows that references obscure 80s shows all the time. This show is extremely fast paste, quirky, and witty, and all around funny.  This is my favorite show.
·         Gilmore Girls: every one in Gilmore Girls talks extremely fast and quirky.
·         Community: Community has off the wall funny references and is a very quirky.

d)      Slapstick Humor: This humor is the lowest type of comedy because it’s, well, unsophisticated, and not at all witty. Most of these movies are forgotten within the first two years of being made. Now there are exceptions, just like there are exceptions for every type of humor; for instance, Charlie Chaplin is a great old time comedian and he used slapstick to get his laughs. However, I will say that only a very small percentage of slapstick comedians actually last the burden of time. In my option, there is really very little funny about this type of comedy, other then people tripping over a cake or spilling chili all over their face. There tends to be a big dog involved as well. Har de har har har. Typically, only children enjoy this type of comedy. For example:
·         Marmaduke: this is based off of the comic. It’s about a big dog. That’s about it.
·         The Duke: This is about a small dog. Who becomes a duke. I’m not kidding.
Now, rarely is a movie just one type of humor. For example, Saturday Night Live is political humor that is quick witted and, many times, crude. That’s why comedy is so hard to pin point, because there is more then just one type in even one movie.
3)      But the real question we’ve been wondering is how is a romantic comedy formed? What makes it work? Obviously you can’t have certain romances paired with certain comedies. For example, if you pair a passionate romance with slapstick comedy, then the passion seems petty and they don’t blend well. So, I’m going to show which comedies go with which romances.
a) The Passion Romances go with the Sophisticated/Political Humor: yes, the political humor works best with this type of romance, mostly because often this humor is serious, as is the passion Romance
b) The Perfect Match Romances go with the Quick Witted Humor: The perfect match romances need to be funny and slightly quirky, just the recipe for quick witted humor! These types of Romantic Comedies are my absolute favorite.
c) The Sweet Romance goes with the Quick Witted, and Raunchy/Crude humor: either the sweet romance is quick witted, or it’s crude, or both! For example, Bride Maids has quick witted humor and also some crude moments, it’s also very sweet.
d) The Teenage Romance goes with the Slapstick Humor: what do you know, the two lowest types of romantic comedies go with each other. I dislike these movies very, very much.

So why does everyone love romantic comedies so much? Well, no one can really know for sure why, but I can say this…people love stories that end happily. In the day to day life that is full of bitterness, hatred, and struggling just to get by, the way that you can forget about the strain of living is to simply watch a movie where there is no bad ending, there is no failure or sadness and everything works out in the end. The romantic comedy presents this happy ending, and it gives hope to the watchers. Whoa! I bet you weren’t expecting such a deep thought for such predictable movies were you?
So there you go, the different types of romantic comedies dissected. I must say this is definitely a good genre, though a little predictable. But when you are having fun watching a movie, then who cares if it’s predictable? Movies are for enjoyment, and I don’t know about you, but I very much enjoy watching those good old Romantic Comedies.